Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors linked to ~16% lower incident AF/flutter vs DPP4 inhibitors in HFpEF and diabetes.
Why the study?
Data regarding prevention of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with HFpEF and type 2 diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors remain limited.
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduce incident atrial fibrillation/flutter in adult patients with HFpEF and type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=37,108)
Yes
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduce incident atrial fibrillation/flutter in adult patients with HFpEF and type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 0.84
Absolute Event Rate: 17.8% vs 19.2%
SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and major cardiovascular events compared to DPP4 inhibitors in patients with HFpEF and type 2 diabetes.
May support preferring SGLT2 over DPP4 inhibitors to lower AF risk in HFpEF with diabetes; extends benefits but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, particularly in patients with Type 2 Diabetes, due to shared cardiometabolic and inflammatory mechanisms. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in HFpEF, but data regarding prevention of incident AF remain limited. Objectives To evaluate the association between SGLT2 inhibitor therapy and incident atrial fibrillation/flutter in patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus. Methods We performed a retrospective propensity score–matched cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults aged ≥18 years with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus receiving oral antihyperglycemic therapy were identified. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors were matched 1:1 with those receiving Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. The primary outcome was incident AF/flutter. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and composite major adverse cardiovascular events (cMACE; all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction). Associations were assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs). Results After propensity matching, 37,108 patients were included (18,554 per group). Compared with DPP4 inhibitor therapy, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower incidence of AF/flutter (17.8% vs 19.2%; HR 0.84, RR 0.93), all-cause mortality (12.5% vs 21.4%; HR 0.53, RR 0.59), ischemic stroke (7.4% vs 8.7%; HR 0.78, RR 0.85), and cMACE (24.4% vs 33.0%; HR 0.66, RR 0.74). Conclusions In patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was associated with lower rates of incident AF/flutter and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting a potential role for SGLT2 inhibitors in modifying arrhythmic risk in addition to established cardiometabolic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acheampong et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in HFpEF and Type 2 Diabetes (n=37,108). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was evaluated on incident AF/flutter (HR 0.84). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower incidence of AF/flutter compared to DPP4 inhibitors (17.8% vs 19.2%; HR 0.84) in patients with HFpEF and type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: