What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to compare the effectiveness and indications for three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

January 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Three Port vs Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Care Centre

I(International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)

Key Points

The aim is to compare the effectiveness and indications for three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Conducted a comparative study involving 130 cases.
Divided participants evenly into two groups of 65 each for different port configurations.
Analyzed primary indications for cholecystectomy.
Gallstones were the most common indication, found in 65% of cases.
Gallbladder polyps were indicated in 23% of cases.
Acalculous cholecystitis accounted for 8% of cases.
Other indications comprised 4% of cases.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is now considered the Gold Standard for gall bladder stones. Gallstone disease remains one of the most prevalent digestive disorders worldwide, affecting an estimated 10–15 % of adults and accounting for more than 600,000 cholecystectomies each year. Discussion: Our study, which included a total of 130 cases (65 in each group), provided a breakdown of the primary indications for the procedure. The most common indication was gallstones, accounting for 65% of cases. This was followed by gall bladder polyps (23%), acalculous cholecystitis (8%), and other less frequent indications (4%).

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR) (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a239e64f732b51ee78f https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18279111

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper