Abstract Introduction Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) has shown a strong association with systemic cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular mortality, but some studies have also reported an increase in non-cardiovascular mortality in these patients. Methods A prospective case–control study was conducted between 2009 and 2019 at Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, involving 333 patients with a first episode of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and 333 age- and sex-matched controls. Patients were referred to internal medicine after diagnosis based on clinical and angiographic criteria. Clinical data were collected using a standardized questionnaire, including cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, alcohol use, and BMI. Median follow-up was 11 years. Overall, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality were recorded in both groups. Cox regression identified variables linked to overall, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality. All analyses were adjusted by individual`s age (at the mean point of the follow-up). Results A total of 666 participants (mean age 67.6 years, 52% men) were included (333 in the RVO group and 333 controls). At ≥ 5 years, mortality was 25% in the RVO group and 24% in controls, with no significant differences in age or sex of deceased individuals. RVO patients had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (73%), dyslipidemia (66%), and diabetes (25%) compared to controls. No significant differences were found in smoking, alcohol use, or BMI. Most RVO cases (67%) involved the temporal branch; 31.5% were central RVO. RVO was associated with increased overall mortality (HR 1.98, p = 0.002) and non-cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.48, p = 0.007), but not cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.86, p = 0.11). No mortality differences were found between branch and central RVO types. Conclusion In our cohort the patients with RVO show increased mortality from non-cardiovascular causes, suggesting it may indicate broader systemic disease. This highlights the need for comprehensive medical evaluation and management beyond just cardiovascular risk.
Fernández et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: