Key result
Exercise echocardiography distinguishes grey-zone athletes from DCM patients by revealing LVEF increases in ~96%.
Why the study?
Distinguishing early dilated cardiomyopathy from physiological left ventricular dilatation with left ventricular ejection fraction <55% in athletes (grey zone) is challenging.
Does a cascade of investigations, including exercise stress echocardiography, differentiate between physiological LV dilatation in athletes and early dilated cardiomyopathy?
Comparison
Cascade of investigations across DCM patients, grey-zone athletes, and athlete controls
Authors
Loading...
May aid differentiation of grey-zone LV dilatation on exercise echo; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Cohort (n=84)
No
Does a cascade of investigations, including exercise stress echocardiography, differentiate between physiological LV dilatation in athletes and early dilated cardiomyopathy?
Effect estimate: null (95% CI null)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.7% vs 13.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Exercise stress echocardiography, specifically the inability to increase LVEF >11% or achieve a peak LVEF >63%, provides the greatest discriminatory value in differentiating physiological LV dilatation in athletes from early dilated cardiomyopathy.
Millar et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy and athlete’s heart differentiation (n=84). Exercise echocardiography vs. Control athletes was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to peak exercise (null, 95% CI null, p=<0.0001). Exercise echocardiography showed that 96% of grey-zone athletes increased LVEF by >11% from baseline to peak exercise compared to only 23% of DCM patients (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: