Why the study?
Despite advances in imaging technologies and evidence of their clinical utility in pulmonary hypertension, clinical practice remains variable and dependent on availability and expertise.
This PVRI consensus statement provides standardized recommendations and a diagnostic algorithm for utilizing imaging modalities in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension.
Addresses variable PH imaging practice; leaves open prospective validation of standardized algorithms on outcomes.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly heterogeneous and despite treatment advances it remains a life‐shortening condition. There have been significant advances in imaging technologies, but despite evidence of their potential clinical utility, practice remains variable, dependent in part on imaging availability and expertise. This statement summarizes current and emerging imaging modalities and their potential role in the diagnosis and assessment of suspected PH. It also includes a review of commonly encountered clinical and radiological scenarios, and imaging and modeling‐based biomarkers. An expert panel was formed including clinicians, radiologists, imaging scientists, and computational modelers. Section editors generated a series of summary statements based on a review of the literature and professional experience and, following consensus review, a diagnostic algorithm and 55 statements were agreed. The diagnostic algorithm and summary statements emphasize the key role and added value of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of PH and highlight areas requiring further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiely et al. (2019) studied pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: