The diffusion of intelligent construction technologies has improved construction efficiency and information integration, while also increasing the complexity and uncertainty of governance decisions in megaprojects. In particular, selecting an appropriate Engineering Transaction Mode (ETM) under intelligent construction involves multiple conflicting criteria, expert judgments, and loss-averse risk preferences, which are not fully captured by conventional multi-criteria decision-making methods. This study proposes a decision-making model that combines Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs) and prospect theory to support ETM selection for megaprojects under intelligent construction. The model constructs an ETM evaluation system grounded in a systematic literature review and questionnaire evidence, encodes expert judgments using PFSs, determines expert and criterion weights via information-utility and fuzzy-entropy measures, and aggregates perceived gains and losses relative to positive and negative ideal solutions through prospect theory. A mega-pumping station project with four ETM alternatives is used for validation. Results indicate that “Self-management + Network-based integrated application + Consultant assistance” achieves the highest prospect value and is consistently ranked first; the same ordering is obtained using TOPSIS and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, demonstrating robustness. The study contributes to theory by coupling hybrid fuzzy representation with loss-aversion-based behavioral aggregation for ETM governance under intelligent construction and provides practitioners with a transparent, replicable decision tool to support ETM selection in complex, uncertainty-laden megaprojects.
Liu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.