Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation reports accurate online secondary dose checks in adaptive planning for MR guided radiation therapy, suggesting efficiency improvements.
To evaluate ThinkQA (TQA), a collapsed cone convolution–based secondary dose check, as an alternative to MU2net (Clarkson-based, point-dose) for online adaptive planning on the Elekta Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac at Townsville University Hospital. Commissioning followed MPPG 5.b tests. The reference-dose agreement, magnetic-field modelling, directional dependence, output factors, off-axis points, heterogeneous slab geometries and calculation properties were assessed. Nine step-and-shoot IMRT plans (courtesy of Elekta) and 226 retrospectively analysed adapted fractions (prostate and pelvic nodes; planning target volumes 1.9–170.0 cm 3 ) were compared between TQA and Monaco by gamma analysis (global 10.0% threshold; 2.0%/2.0 mm, 3.0%/2.0 mm). At 10.0 cm depth under TQA reference conditions, the mean absolute point-dose difference versus Monaco was 0.4%. TQA reproduced models the magnetic-field–induced cross-plane asymmetry with close agreement to Monaco. Directional dependence differences were ≤ ± 1.2% except when traversing the couch (± 1.8%). Output factors agreed within ≤ 1.0% (SSD 133.5 cm) and ≤ 2.0% (SSD 138.5 cm). In 226 clinical fractions, 3.0%/2.0 mm (global) yielded 93.0% passes in the high-dose region and 100.0% in other regions; 2.0%/2.0 mm yielded 25% high-dose passes. TQA results were available within about 1 min post Monaco export. TQA provides accurate, rapid, volumetric secondary dose verification for Unity, improves agreement with Monaco, and reduces console time by eliminating dose point re-selection. A 3.0%/2.0 mm global gamma criterion is a clinical acceptance level, with tighter criteria reserved for targeted investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brodmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: