Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study evaluates brief cognitive behavioral therapy's effectiveness in reducing chronic pain among military beneficiaries, suggesting feasibility and positive short-term outcomes.
Chronic pain is common among military service members, retirees, and families, yet non-pharmacologic options in primary care are limited. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, and outcomes of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (BCBT-CP) delivered by integrated Behavioral Health Consultants (BHCs) in a Military Health System (MHS) clinic. This prospective, observational pragmatic pilot study recruited 44 Department of Defense beneficiaries ( M age = 44.5 years [SD = 9.3 years]; 75% female; 50% Caucasian; 47.7% military family members, 38.6% retirees) with chronic pain (≥ 12 weeks). As part of usual care, participants received BCBT-CP, a modular skills-based intervention delivered within the Primary Care Behavioral Health model. Measures included the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS), the Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG-3) scale, and the Behavioral Health Measure (BHM-20), assessed at baseline, during treatment, and 3- and 6-months after the baseline assessment. Feasibility was high, with 44 of 45 approached patients enrolling in the study. These participants attended a median of 3 appointments (IQR 2–6) over 52 days (IQR 22–110.5). Significant improvements were observed on DVPRS pain intensity ( p < .001) and interference with activity, sleep, and stress. PEG total and subscales also improved ( p < .05). No significant changes were detected on the BHM-20. Follow-up outcome data suggested partial loss of gains due to small sample size and attrition. Using BHCs to implement BCBT-CP in MHS primary care is feasible and improves short-term pain outcomes. Larger trials should test strategies to sustain benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: