Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis finds significant differences in muscle coordination during side kicks among male Sanda athletes, indicating skill level impacts performance.
Objective: to clarify differences in the intermuscular coherence of core muscles during side kicks among male Sanda athletes at varying skill levels, particularly in critical frequency bands; to reveal the association between neuromuscular coordination mechanisms and technical proficiency; and to provide methodological references for quantitative analysis of combat sports techniques. Methods: Thirty-six male Sanda athletes were divided into professional (n = 18) and amateur (n = 18) groups based on athletic ranking and training duration. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from 15 core muscles and kinematic data were synchronously recorded using a wireless EMG system and a high-speed camera. Signal processing extracted root mean square amplitude (RMS) and integral EMG (iEMG). Muscle coordination was quantified via time-frequency coherence analysis across alpha (8–15 Hz), beta (15–30 Hz), and gamma (30–50 Hz) bands. Results: The professional group exhibited significantly higher RMS and iEMG values in most core muscles (e.g., rectus femoris RMS: 0.298 ± 0.072 vs. 0.214 ± 0.077 mV, p < 0.001). Regarding intermuscular coherence, the professional group demonstrated significantly superior coherence in the α, β, and γ bands for key muscle pairs, including upper limb–swing leg, support leg–swing leg, and upper limb–support leg. Notable differences were observed in pairs such as external oblique–rectus femoris (alpha band: 0.039 ± 0.012 vs. 0.032 ± 0.011, p < 0.01) and right rectus femoris–biceps femoris (beta band: 0.033 ± 0.010 vs. 0.023 ± 0.007, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The fundamental difference in side kick technique among Sanda athletes lies in neuromuscular control strategies and muscle coordination efficiency. Sensor-based intermuscular coherence analysis provides an objective quantitative indicator for distinguishing technical proficiency, offering a scientific basis for optimizing training and extending the methodological framework for technique assessment in combat sports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: