PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 27, 1999Circulation1,761 citationsOpen Access

Is Pulse Pressure Useful in Predicting Risk for Coronary Heart Disease?

View Full Paper
SFStanley S. FranklinSKShehzad Akbar KhanNWNathan D. Wong

Key Result

Pulse pressure was found to be a superior predictor of coronary heart disease risk compared to systolic and diastolic blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly adults.

Structured PICO

Does pulse pressure predict incident coronary heart disease in middle-aged and elderly adults without prior CHD?

P
Population
Men and women between 50 and 79 years of age at baseline with no clinical evidence of coronary heart disease and not taking antihypertensive drug therapy
I
Intervention
Pulse pressure (PP) measurement
O
Outcome
Incident coronary heart disease (fatal or nonfatal)hard clinical

In middle-aged and elderly adults, pulse pressure is a strong independent predictor of coronary heart disease risk, challenging the belief that systolic and diastolic blood pressures contribute equally to risk.

Limitations

  • Single office pulse pressure may not be accurate in the individual subject
  • Original Framingham sample consisted almost exclusively of whites, the majority of whom were middle class, so results may not apply to other ethnic or socioeconomic groups
  • Cannot determine whether the association between pulse pressure and CHD events is causal or a marker for underlying vascular disease
  • Potential selection bias resulting from the exclusion of subjects receiving antihypertensive therapy at baseline

Abstract

Background —Current definitions of hypertension are based on levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), but not on pulse pressure (PP). We examined whether PP adds useful information for predicting coronary heart disease (CHD) in the population-based Framingham Heart Study. Methods and Results —We studied 1924 men and women between 50 and 79 years of age at baseline with no clinical evidence of CHD and not taking antihypertensive drug therapy. Cox regression, adjusted for age, sex, and other risk factors, was used to assess the relations between blood pressure components and CHD risk over a 20-year follow-up. The association with CHD risk was positive for SBP, DBP, and PP, considering each pressure individually; of the 3, PP yielded the largest χ 2 statistic. When SBP and DBP were jointly entered into the multivariable model, the association with CHD risk was positive for SBP (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.30) and negative for DBP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98). Four subgroups were defined according to SBP levels (<120, 120 to 139, 140 to 159, and ≥160 mm Hg). Within each subgroup, the association with CHD risk was negative for DBP and positive for PP. A cross-classification of SBP-DBP levels confirmed these results. Conclusions —In the middle-aged and elderly, CHD risk increased with lower DBP at any level of SBP≥120 mm Hg, suggesting that higher PP was an important component of risk. Neither SBP nor DBP was superior to PP in predicting CHD risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Franklin et al. (1999) studied this question. Pulse pressure was found to be a superior predictor of coronary heart disease risk compared to systolic and diastolic blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly adults.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6970e34ae46c5fd093946dc1https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.4.354
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper