Key result
BiV-CRT improves outcomes in HFrEF patients with prolonged QRS duration.
Why the study?
Understanding the mechanisms, indications, and delivery options of cardiac resynchronisation therapy is useful for optimizing patient selection.
Does biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration?
Does biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration?
This review summarizes the mechanisms, indications, and delivery options for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure and conduction system disease.
Supports BiV-CRT in HFrEF with wide QRS; confirms prior RCTs while leaving optimal delivery open.
### Learning objectives The aim of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is to improve cardiac function by delivering more physiological cardiac activation to patients with conduction system disease. The most widely investigated method for delivering CRT is biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT). Multiple randomised control trials (RCTs) have found BiV-CRT improves outcomes when it is delivered to patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction (EF) and prolonged QRS duration.1–3 The majority of patients included in RCTs assessing BiV-CRT had left bundle branch block (LBBB), were in sinus rhythm, New York Heart Assocation (NYHA) class II or greater and had an EF ≤35%. BiV-CRT is also used as an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients who have ventricular impairment and require a high percentage of ventricular pacing.4 Understanding the mechanism through which BiV-CRT delivers its beneficial effects is useful when considering patient selection. ### Improving ventricular electrical dyssynchrony When a patient develops LBBB, this prolongs left ventricular (LV) activation time and produces a non-physiological LV activation pattern. These changes result in less efficient contraction and reduced cardiac output.5 BiV pacing aims to deliver more effective ventricular activation by pacing the left and right ventricles. Ventricular activation occurs via cell-to-cell conduction with activation wavefronts originating from the two pacing sites. The activation time during BiV pacing is typically longer than occurs during activation via the intact conduction system and is relatively constant regardless of intrinsic activation.6 The potential for BiV pacing to deliver improvements in ventricular activation time is dependent on the presenting (intrinsic) conduction delay. A …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keene et al. (2021) studied this question. Biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT) significantly improves outcomes in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: