Comparative Analysis of the Accuracy of Temperature and Precipitation Data in Brazil

Accurate air temperature and precipitation data are fundamental for environmental and socioeconomic applications in Brazil. However, the observational network managed by the National Institute of Meteorology, suffers from spatial gaps, necessitating the use of gridded datasets. This study provides a rigorous comparative assessment of three prominent gridded products—the station-interpolated dataset of Brazilian Daily Weather Gridded Data (BR-DWGD), the satellite-gauge blended product MERGE, and the ERA5-Land Reanalysis dataset—against station data. We evaluate the performance of the institutionally supported MERGE and ERA5-Land products as viable alternatives to the interpolated dataset. Daily data for maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), and total precipitation were selected from 1994 to 2024 and analyzed using statistical metrics. The interpolated product showed the highest fidelity to observations, especially for temperature. For precipitation, the MERGE product demonstrated the best performance, achieving higher correlation and lower error than both the interpolated dataset and the poorly performing ERA5-Land. For temperature, ERA5-Land proved to be an excellent alternative for minimum temperature, but exhibited significant regional biases for maximum temperature and a tendency to underestimate heat extremes. We conclude that MERGE is the most robust alternative for precipitation studies in Brazil. ERA5-Land is a highly reliable source for minimum temperature, but its direct use for maximum temperature requires caution.