This pilot study evaluates satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer, suggesting the need for better cosmetic outcomes.
Background Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is a widely accepted for early-stage breast cancer, supporting esthetic preservation and enhancing quality of life. The BREAST-Q is the gold standard patient-reported outcome measure PROM for evaluating satisfaction and post-operative wellbeing. This study employed the newly adapted Vietnamese BREAST-Q version 2.0, to assess patient satisfaction after NSM with IBR and explore influencing factors within a Vietnamese cohort. Methods A pilot linguistic validation of the BREAST-Q version 2.0 was first conducted in 20 patients from July 2021 to May 2022, demonstrating internal consistency and convergent validity. A subsequent cohort of 55 post-operative patients undergoing NSM with immediate IBR (July 2022-July 2024) participated in satisfaction assessment across eight BREAST-Q domains. Statistical significance was defined at P < .05. Results The tool demonstrated acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.70) and strong convergent validity with objective esthetic scoring (r = 0.912; P < .001). Among 55 participants (mean age (43.2 ± 7.4 years), notable post-operative outcomes included Physical wellbeing-Back & Shoulder (62.3 ± 7.9), Physical Wellbeing-Chest (84.5 ± 18.6), Psychological Wellbeing (73.9 ± 15.7), and high Implant Satisfaction (81.9 ± 22.0). However, esthetic satisfaction declined significantly post-operatively (75.9 vs 65.8; P < .001). Patients ≥40 years reported higher psychological wellbeing (76.2 vs 66.3; P = .04). Reduced esthetic results correlated with lower overall satisfaction. Conclusion The Vietnamese BREAST-Q shows acceptable internal consistency and strong convergent validity, supporting its clinical utility. The decline in post-operative esthetic satisfaction highlights rising patient expectations, emphasizing the need for improved cosmetic outcomes and individualized care planning in Vietnam.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: