Key result
No prior antiplatelet therapy linked to ~25% lower sICH risk vs SAPT.
Why the study?
Whether patients with acute ischaemic stroke and prior antiplatelet therapy are at higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage has not been established.
Does prior antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Does prior antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
In patients with acute ischaemic stroke, prior single antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage compared to no prior therapy, while prior dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with higher recurrent ischaemic stroke and worse functional outcomes.
Prior single antiplatelet use was associated with higher sICH risk after acute ischaemic stroke; leaves open whether to alter prehospital therapy pending randomized data.
Introduction Whether patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) are at higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) has not been established. This study aimed to determine whether prior APT increases the risk of bleeding. Methods 41,113 patients treated for AIS in Switzerland between 2014 and 2022 were analysed. The primary outcome was sICH, and secondary outcomes were recurrent ischaemic stroke (IS), all-cause mortality, functional outcome at discharge and 90 days. Patients grouped by prior APT: no APT (nAPT), single APT (SAPT), and dual APT (DAPT) were analysed using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. Confounding variables, including revascularisation treatment, were accounted for using multivariable adjustment and matching, and a time-to-event analysis was performed. Results In the adjusted analysis at 90 days, patients with nAPT versus SAPT had a decreased risk of sICH (aOR 0.75 (0.62–0.90), p < 0.01), while these occurred within the first days. There was no difference in the risk of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality, or functional outcome. Patients with DAPT had no higher risk of sICH or mortality than those with SAPT, but a higher occurrence of recurrent IS (aOR 1.41 (1.12–1.77), p < 0.01) and worse functional outcome (aOR 1.18 (1.07–1.31), p < 0.01). The results were consistent after adjusting for revascularisation treatment. Conclusions Patients with nAPT had a lower risk of sICH than those with SAPT. Patients with DAPT have a higher risk of recurrent IS and worse functional outcome respectively. The majority of sICH occurred within the first days after admission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nussbaum et al. (2025) studied this question. Patients with no prior antiplatelet therapy had a 25% lower risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage compared to those on single antiplatelet therapy (aOR 0.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: