Demonstrates improved fingerprint recognition in varying conditions, indicating better performance than traditional systems.
Fingerprint recognition systems have relied on fragile workflows based on minutiae extraction, which suffer from significant performance losses under real-world conditions such as sensor diversity and low image quality. This study introduces a fully minutiae-free fingerprint recognition framework based on self-supervised Vision Transformers. A systematic evaluation of multiple DINOv2 model variants is conducted, and the proposed system ultimately adopts the DINOv2-Base Vision Transformer as the primary configuration, as it offers the best generalization performance trade-off under conditions of limited fingerprint data. Larger variants are additionally analyzed to assess scalability and capacity limits. The DINOv2 pretrained network is fine-tuned using self-supervised domain adaptation on 64,801 fingerprint images, eliminating all classical enhancement, binarization, and minutiae extraction steps. Unlike the single-sensor protocols commonly used in the literature, the proposed approach is extensively evaluated in a heterogeneous testbed with a wide range of sensors, qualities, and acquisition methods, including 1631 unique fingers from 12 datasets. The achieved EER of 5.56% under these challenging conditions demonstrates clear cross-sensor superiority over traditional systems such as VeriFinger (26.90%) and SourceAFIS (41.95%) on the same testbed. A systematic comparison of different model capacities shows that moderate-scale ViT models provide optimal generalization under limited-data conditions. Explainability analyses indicate that the attention maps of the model trained without any minutiae information exhibit meaningful overlap with classical structural regions (IoU = 0.41 ± 0.07). Openly sharing the full implementation and evaluation infrastructure makes the study reproducible and provides a standardized benchmark for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilgehan Arslan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: