Key result
Dual-chamber leadless pacemakers maintain ~97% AV synchrony during daily living.
Why the study?
Dual-chamber leadless pacemakers rely on beat-to-beat wireless communication, but atrioventricular synchrony needed evaluation during ambulatory daily living.
Does a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker maintain atrioventricular synchrony during real-world ambulatory conditions in patients with standard indications for dual-chamber pacing?
Does a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker maintain atrioventricular synchrony during real-world ambulatory conditions in patients with standard indications for dual-chamber pacing?
A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system successfully maintained >96% atrioventricular synchrony during 24 hours of daily living, demonstrating the real-world feasibility of wireless DDD(R) pacing.
Supports ambulatory dual-chamber leadless pacing; leaves open randomized outcome trials versus transvenous systems.
Background and Aims A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system relies on a beat-to-beat, wireless, implant-to-implant (i2iTM) communication between implanted devices in the right atrium and right ventricle (A-to-V and V-to-A). Atrioventricular (AV) synchrony was evaluated during an ambulatory 24-hour period of daily living. Methods A prospective, single-arm, multi-center clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05252702) evaluated the overall safety and performance of the dual-chamber LPs in patients with standard indications for dual-chamber pacing. Following the 3-month visit, eligible patients wore 12-lead Holter monitors for 24 hours while resuming the activities of daily living while under clinically driven programmed settings. LP diagnostic data were interrogated when patients returned to the clinic. An independent Holter core laboratory adjudicated the proportion of synchronous beats (PR intervals within paced and sensed AV delay bounds). Relationships between AV synchrony and i2i communication success rate, implant indication, heart rate, and AV event type were evaluated. Results Among 47 analyzable patients, mean AV synchrony was achieved in 96.7% of beats, exceeding mean A-to-V and V-to-A transmission success rates of 93.4% and 92.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences in AV synchrony between sinus node and AV block patients. Across all AV paced/sensed cycle combinations and heart rate ranges (including >100 bpm), AV synchrony was sustained >90% in an ambulatory real-world setting. Conclusions A dual-chamber leadless pacing system demonstrated >96% overall AV synchrony for a 24-hour period of daily living while programmed to clinically appropriate settings, thus showing that true dual-chamber DDD(R) pacing can be maintained in a real-world environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Defaye et al. (2026) studied this question. A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker maintained 96.7% AV synchrony over 24 hours in daily living, with transmission success rates of 93.4% and 92.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: