This assessment reveals the effects of skidder traffic on soil properties in mixed forests, suggesting effective monitoring methods.
While the impact of forestry machinery on soil structure is well documented, large-scale monitoring of soil compaction in managed forests is hindered by the high spatial variability of soils, the labour intensity of conventional methods, and their time-consuming and destructive nature. These challenges obstruct the implementation of preventive strategies, such as optimised skid-trail design, to mitigate soil degradation. Meanwhile, efficient, non-destructive soil assessment techniques suitable for operational forestry remain underdeveloped. Here, we evaluate the potential of electrical resistivity tomography for detecting skidder-induced compaction in forest soils. Conducted in two Carpathian forests, the study employed two approaches: successive and spatially aligned soil electrical resistivity (ER) measurements before and after two loaded skidder passes in locality 1, and parallel ER measurements on a skid road formed by approximately forty passes alongside a non-trafficked area in Locality 2. Decreases of approximately 10 Ω m were observed after just two passes in locality 1 and > 200 Ω m after approximately forty passes in Locality 2, respectively. This study provides the first assessment of ER changes along forest skid trail sections almost 10 m long, accompanied by a soil porosity (φ) reduction of up to 13%. Significant effects of skidder traffic and locality on φ were indicated by two-way ANOVA ( p = 0.013, R 2 = 0.335). Partial evidence for a significant co-occurrence of negative changes in both soil ER and φ was indicated by a probabilistic analysis under the assumption of independence ( p < 0.01). However, higher φ sampling density, spatially aligned with soil ER variation, is required for a robust correlation analysis. These findings support the integration of ER tomography into forest operations as a decision-support tool while highlighting the necessity for diverse environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Homolák et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: