Research demonstrates improved fault boundary detection using 3D-FDTD simulation in coal seams, indicating enhanced modeling accuracy.
During coal mining, detecting subsurface structures (such as faults, voids, collapse columns, etc.) using radio waves in existing mines is hindered by the absence of effective three-dimensional coal seam medium models and simulation methods, adversely affecting the forward modeling of data analysis. This study establishes a Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Time-Domain (3D-FDTD) radio wave penetration medium model based on coal seam tunnel penetration working conditions to simulate the electric field intensity characteristics of longitudinal and transverse waves in various coal rock mediums. Firstly, a higher-order finite difference method based on Maxwell’s equations is employed to analyze the electric field characteristics of gas-enriched areas under various geological conditions, enabling the exploration of the relationship between the position and size of the electromagnetic wave field strength in different areas. The electromagnetic wave field strength response data are then analyzed during the actual detection process to determine the specific location, shape, and size of the abnormal area. Finally, by comparing the simulation results with an actual engineering project, electromagnetic wave field strength attenuation data were collected from 158 measuring points at a working face of a coal mine in Anhui. The detection results clearly illustrate the changes in electric field intensity (with attenuation coefficients ranging from 0.41 to 0.77 dB/m) in anomalous areas, enabling the forward simulation to accurately determine the position and size of faults. The novelty of this study lies in the establishment of a conductivity-weighted 3D-FDTD model specifically calibrated for complex coal seam environments, which significantly improves the accuracy of fault boundary detection compared to traditional linear inversion methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: