PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging1 citations

Intraindividual Comparison of Half‐Dose Gadopiclenol and Standard‐Dose Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Contrast‐Enhanced Abdominal MRI

View Full Paper
AGAntonella Del GaudioAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'AndreaDSDomenico De SantisResearch Institute for Geo-Hydrological ProtectionLLLudovica LofinoDuke Medical Center

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare image quality and lesion visibility between half-dose gadopiclenol and standard-dose gadobenate in abdominal MRI.
  • Retrospective study of 100 patients undergoing two MRIs with gadopiclenol and gadobenate within 12 months.
  • Used 1.5T / 3T MRI systems with a specific fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence.
  • Evaluated signal intensities, SNR, CNR, and subjective assessments using a 5-point Likert scale.
  • Gadopiclenol showed higher CNR and SNR for pancreas, portal vein, and kidney in late arterial phase.
  • No significant differences in CNR and SNR in portal venous phase.
  • Gadobenate had higher hepatic CNR in equilibrium phase, but other organs' measures were comparable.
  • Lesion visibility measures were similar across both agents, with no significant differences noted.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Gadopiclenol is a high‐relaxivity contrast agent enabling dose reduction while maintaining image quality. However, comparison with conventional agents remains limited in body MRI. Purpose To intra‐individually compare half‐dose gadopiclenol and standard‐dose gadobenate for image quality and lesion conspicuity in abdominal MRI. Study Type Retrospective. Population One hundred patients (55 men; mean age: 64 ± 14 years) who underwent both abdominal MRI with gadobenate (0.1 mmol/kg) and gadopiclenol (0.05 mmol/kg) on the same scanner within 12 months. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T / 3T , dynamic T1 ‐weighted imaging pre‐contrast, early arterial ( EAP ), late arterial ( LAP ), portal venous ( PVP ), and equilibrium phases ( EP ) using 3D fat‐suppressed gradient echo sequence. Assessment Signal intensity of liver, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, aorta, portal vein, and abdominal lesions was measured on each phase except EAP. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and magnitude of contrast enhancement (ΔE) were calculated for organs. In lesions, lesion‐to‐background ratio (LBR) and ΔE were calculated. Subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity were assessed by three readers using a 5‐point Likert scale. Statistical Tests Paired t ‐test and Wilcoxon test. p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant results. Results Gadopiclenol yielded significantly higher CNR and SNR for pancreas, portal vein, and kidney in LAP. No significant differences in CNR ( p: 0.372–0.858) and SNR ( p : 0.433–0.936) were found in PVP. In EP, gadobenate showed higher hepatic CNR, while CNR and SNR of all other organs were comparable ( p : 0.103–0.912). Gadopiclenol showed higher pancreatic ΔE in all enhanced phases. LBR and ΔE of 21 evaluated lesions were comparable across all phases ( p : 0.100–0.821). No significant differences were observed in readers' perception of lesion enhancement ( p : 0.059–0.957). Conclusion Half‐dose gadopiclenol provides comparable subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity to standard‐dose gadobenate, with superior pancreatic, kidney, and portal vein enhancement in LAP, and similar performance in PVP and EP. Level of Evidence 4.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gaudio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bea8642b1836717e3448https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70207
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper