The results show that the numerical simulation error based on the RPI two-phase boiling heat transfer model is less than 5%, which is in good agreement with the test results. Compared with the original engine, the temperature near the spark plugs’ position of improvement in scheme 2 decreased by 8.4 K, and the maximum temperature difference between the cylinder head intake and exhaust decreased by 14 K. Moreover, the overheating degree of the water jacket wall is the lowest, avoiding the occurrence of film boiling, and the local maximum vaporization rate is less than 50%. The prototype tests also confirmed that the improvement scheme effectively enhanced the heat transfer performance of the water jacket. The inlet flow rate and temperature of the coolant have significant and complex effects on two-phase boiling heat transfer. Both too low a flow rate and too high a temperature will lead to local film boiling, deteriorating heat transfer. Too high a flow rate will blow away bubbles, while too low an inlet temperature will not cause boiling, both of which can only enforce convective heat transfer. Appropriately reducing the flow rate and increasing the temperature can effectively utilize the enhanced heat transfer potential of subcooled boiling, while also save pump power consumption and improving engine fuel economy. The average heat flux density of boiling heat transfer in this paper is 13.9% higher than that of the forced convective heat transfer. When designing a water jacket with boiling heat transfer, attention should be paid to the transport effect of convective motion on bubbles, controlling subcooled boiling in the high-temperature zone and preventing film boiling.
Tang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.