Examines cytotoxic CD4+ T cells' role in mucosal inflammation, predicting treatment resistance in ulcerative colitis.
Background The contribution of cytotoxic T cells to the pathogenesis and treatment outcomes of ulcerative colitis (UC) remains poorly understood. Methods We integrated in vitro functional assays, multiparameter flow cytometry, bulk transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), and single-cell spatial transcriptomics analyses to characterise cytotoxic T-cell responses in UC and evaluate their association with clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Results In vitro stimulation of lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs) from UC patients with agonistic anti-CD3 antibodies upregulated cytotoxic gene programs, including GZMB, indicating enhanced T-cell cytotoxicity. Bulk transcriptomics analysis using the TaMMA resource1 confirmed upregulation of these cytotoxic genes in the UC colonic mucosa compared to non-IBD controls and Crohn’s disease. Multiparameter flow cytometry of 42 UC patients and 22 controls showed increased GZMB+ LPMCs in UC. Surprisingly, CD4+ T cells were a major source of GZMB in UC patients and were significantly more abundant than in controls. These GZMB+ CD4+ T cells exhibited a “hyper-inflammatory” polyfunctional phenotype, co-expressing IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-17, IL-22, and TNFα, with cells producing ≥3 pro-inflammatory cytokines significantly increased in UC compared to controls (p = 0.004). Analysis of UC scRNAseq data2 confirmed that GZMB+ CD4+ T cells co-expressed cytotoxic genes (GZMA, PRF1) and pro-inflammatory mediators (IFNG, IL26, OSM) compared to GZMB- CD4+ T cells. A cytotoxic CD4+ T-cell gene signature derived from these data was strongly enriched in UC compared to controls in a large independent cohort (n = 525)3, increasing with endoscopic disease severity and stratifying UC patients by degree of cytotoxic enrichment (Figure 1). Independent single-cell spatial transcriptomics analysis further validated enrichment of this cytotoxic CD4+ T-cell signature in UC versus non-IBD colonic tissues. This signature was also detected in multiple murine models of colitis, with strongest upregulation observed in T-cell transfer colitis. Notably, higher cytotoxic CD4+ T-cell signature enrichment predicted poor response to ustekinumab at week 8 in the UNIFI trial4 (n = 384) for mucosal healing (OR 0.11, p-value = 0.042), even after adjusting for CRP, faecal calprotectin, Total Mayo Score, disease duration, and prior anti-TNF failure. Similarly, the signature was upregulated (p-value = 0.013) in baseline biopsies from UC patients who failed to achieve mucosal healing to infliximab compared with responders in an independent cohort. Conclusion Pro-inflammatory cytotoxic GZMB+ CD4+ T cells are increased in the colonic mucosa of UC patients, correlate with endoscopic disease severity, and predict resistance to biologic therapies. References: 1.Massimino L, Lamparelli LA, Houshyar Y, et al. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Transcriptome and Metatranscriptome Meta-Analysis (IBD TaMMA) framework. Nature Computational Science 2021 1:8. 2021;1(8):511-515. doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00114-y. 2.Smillie CS, Biton M, Ordovas-Montanes J, et al. Intra- and Inter-cellular Rewiring of the Human Colon during Ulcerative Colitis. Cell. 2019;178(3):714-730.e22. doi:10.1016/J.CELL.2019.06.029. 3.Argmann C, Hou R, Ungaro RC, et al. Biopsy and blood-based molecular biomarker of inflammation in IBD. Gut. 2023;72(7):1271-1287. doi:10.1136/GUTJNL-2021-326451. 4.Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;381(13):1201-1214. doi:10.1056/NEJMOA1900750. Conflict of interest: Thomas, John P: Research support from AstraZeneca and Roche Hermangild Kottoor, Sherine: No conflict of interest Ibraheim, Hajir: No conflict of interest Cozzetto, Domenico: No conflict of interest Wooldridge, Tyler: No conflict of interest Madgwick, Matthew: No conflict of interest Olbei, Marton: No conflict of interest Digby-Bell, Jonathan Leith: Speaker fees: AbbVie, Lilly, J&J Conference and Travel Fees: AbbVie, Lilly Advisory board: AbbVie Lo, Jonathan: No conflict of interest Korcsmaros, Tamas: Grant: Unilever, Roche Powell, Nick: Grant: Takeda, BMS, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca Personal Fees: Abbvie, Abivax, Allergan, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma UK Ltd, Ferring, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Sobi, Takeda, Tillotts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: