Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals limitations of protein structures in unnatural conditions, suggesting improved methods for functional understanding.
Structures of proteins and multiprotein complexes are considered landmark achievements. However, in many cases, mutant proteins are used for structural work. Even when wild type proteins are used, crystallization or complex formation for cryoEM is performed in highly nonphysiological conditions. This explains why the structures can be inconsistent with the functional data. The structures are always true, but solved structures faithfully reveal the mode of interactions of the proteins used in the conditions employed. The structures are static, whereas proteins are dynamic. Even when a series of structures are solved, the dynamics are only implied or deduced via molecular dynamics simulations. The mechanisms of protein function in the natural environment can be revealed by the combination of structural, biochemical, biophysical, and in vivo studies, supplemented by molecular modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurevich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: