Prospective study finds higher risankizumab levels correlate with biochemical remission in Crohn’s disease, suggesting effective treatment monitoring.
Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become an established strategy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to optimise biological therapy efficacy, particularly for anti-TNF agents. However, data on the relationship between risankizumab (RZB) serum concentrations and clinical outcomes remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the association between RZB trough levels and biochemical remission (BR) in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients during maintenance therapy. Methods We conducted a prospective study including CD patients treated with RZB (intravenous induction at weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by subcutaneous maintenance every 8 weeks) between 2024 and 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Trough RZB concentrations (RZBconc) were measured by ELISA (Shikari® Q-UST and S-ATU, Matriks Biotek) after 8 weeks of treatment, corresponding to the maintenance phase. BR was defined as faecal calprotectin ≤150 mg/kg. Data were analysed by quartiles, and a binary logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of BR at the time of pharmacokinetic assessment. Results Sixteen patients were included (male 63.5%; mean age 46 [28–76] years; body weight 73 [49–122] kg; baseline albumin 4.1 [3.4–4.7] g/dL; ileal disease L1 47.2%). Median RZB treatment duration was 24 (12–108) weeks, with prior exposure to ≥ 2 biologics in 93.7% of cases. Higher RZB concentrations tended to be associated with biochemical remission (Figure 1). A positive correlation was observed between RZB levels and BR rate, although logistic regression did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.106), likely due to limited sample size. Conclusion Higher serum RZB concentrations were associated with a greater likelihood of biochemical remission in CD. TDM of RZB may represent a valuable tool to personalise treatment and optimise clinical outcomes during the maintenance phase. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings. Conflict of interest: Reygosa, María Cristina: No conflict of interest Del Rosario García, Betel: No conflict of interest Salas Pérez, Ana: No conflict of interest Ramos Díaz, Ruth: No conflict of interest Carrillo Palau, Marta: No conflict of interest Alonso, Inmaculada: No conflicts Gutiérrez Nicolás, Fernando: No conflict of interest Medina Chico, José Sergio: No conflict of interest Ramos Lopez, Laura: L.R. has acted as a speaker or received funding for training from MSD, Abbvie, Adacyte, Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, and Ferring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reygosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: