Multicenter analysis identifies prognostic factors affecting survival in patients undergoing conversion surgery for pancreatic cancer, suggesting improved patient outcomes.
Objective: To identify prognostic factors, including preoperative treatment duration, among patients who underwent conversion surgery (CS) for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC). Background: While CS has been increasingly adopted for UR-LAPC, optimal perioperative strategies remain controversial. Methods: This multicenter study included 465 UR-LAPC patients who underwent CS following preoperative chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) from 2015 to 2020 at 84 Japanese institutions. Results: Median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation was 43.8 months with a 5-year survival rate of 37.2%. A prognostic cutoff for preoperative treatment duration was identified at 6.1 months using maximally selected rank statistics. Patients receiving >6 months of preoperative treatment (n=350) demonstrated significantly better OS (50.4 vs. 29.7 mo) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (15.6 vs. 9.1 mo) compared with those receiving ≤6 months (n=115, both P <0.001). Multivariate analysis identified four independent preoperative prognostic factors: treatment duration >6 months, FFX-based regimens, normal tumor markers (CA19-9 and CEA), and a prognostic nutritional index ≥45 before CS. These four preoperative factors enabled clear prognostic stratification: patients with ≥3 factors showed significantly improved survival compared with those with ≤2 factors (HR 0.44, P <0.0001; 5-year OS: 59.8% vs. 26.3%). Conclusions: The combination of four preoperative prognostic factors may enable risk stratification among patients undergoing CS for UR-LAPC. These findings may help inform treatment sequencing and patient selection, although external validation is needed to confirm their generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasuda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: