Cross-sectional study demonstrates improved diagnosis of IBD-related spondylarthritis through multidisciplinary collaboration, indicating potential for better patient outcomes.
Background Spondyloarthritis (SpA) represents the most common extraintestinal manifestation observed in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), with an estimated prevalence of approximately 15%. SpA, encompasses a group of disorders —including radiographic ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, non-radiographic axial SpA, undifferentiated SpA, and IBD-associated SpA—characterized by similar clinical, radiological and genetic features. The similarities between SpA and other non-SpA spondyloarthropaties often complicates differential diagnosis. In this context, multidisciplinary collaboration can facilitate accurate classification and early diagnosis, enabling timely intervention and preventing long-term structural damage. This cross-sectional study evalutes the impact of a collaborative multidisciplinary approach between gastroenterologist and rheumatologist on the early diagnosis of IBD-related spondylarthritis (IBD-SpA) and its differentiation from other musculoskeletal manifestations. Methods This is cross-sectional study in which IBD out-patients were evaluated simultaneously by a gastroenterologist and a rheumatologist. Patients underwent a comprehensive rheumatologic assessment, the DETAIL questionnaire and laboratory and imaging investigations if indicated. The suspected cases were classified as newly diagnosed IBD-SpA, alternative diagnoses, or nonspecific arthralgias. Results A total of 605 IBD patients were screened for IBD-spA (Table 1). Among them, 81 (13%) had a known diagnosis of SpA, and 117 (19.3%) were suspected of having IBD-SpA. Upon further assessment, SpA was confirmed in 18 (15%) suspected cases, yielding a 22% relative increase in SpA prevalence. mostly identified within the first year of symptom onset (44% of cases). A longer diagnostic delay was observed in patients with axial vs peripheral involvement (mean ±SD 12.4 ± 10.2 vs 2.9 ± 2.9, p = 0.035). SpA was excluded in 85% of suspected cases, which were ultimately diagnoses as other arthropaties (60%) or non-specific arthralgias (25%). Figure 1. Swollen joint count was the only predictor of SpA diagnosis (adjOR 5.70, 95%CI 2.18-1.61, p < 0.001). Finally, while 67% of patients with suspected SpA reported back pain, only 18% met ASAS criteria for inflammatory back pain. Magnetic Risonance Imaging was performed in all patients with IBP, showing evidence of sacroiliitis and/or spondylitis in 24% of cases. Conclusion A multidisciplinary approach significantly enhances the early and accurate identification of IBD-SpA. This strategy improves diagnostic accuracy, facilitating timely intervention and tailored management for affected patients. References: 1. Karreman MC, Luime JJ, Hazes JMW, et al. The prevalence and incidence of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis in inflammatory bowel disease: asystematic review and Meta-analysis. J Crohn Colitis 2017;11:631-42. 2. Dougados M, Baeten D Spondyloarthritis. Lancet 2011;377:2127–37. 3. Mitsuhiro Akiyama, Waleed Alshehri, Koji Suzuki, Kanako Shimanuki, Koichi Saito, Yuko Kaneko,Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis, Autoimmunity Reviews, Volume 24, Issue 9, 2025, 103853. Conflict of interest: Piras, Raffaela: No conflict of interest Floris, Alberto: No conflict of interest Dr. Favale, Agnese: Advisory Board for AbbVie Sichi, Leonardo: No conflict of interest Falconi, Marcella: No conflict of interest Olla, Federica: No conflict of interest Pace, Andrea: No conflict of interest Onnis, Francesca: No conflict of interest Angioni, Maria Maddalena: No conflict of interest Italia, Angelo: No conflict of interest Fantini, Massimo Claudio: MCF has acted as a consultant for: AbbVie, AlfaSigma, Celgene, Celltrion, Gilead, Pfizer, MSD, Bristol-Meyer, Takeda, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Galapagos, Biogen, Sandoz, Eli-Lilly, Lionhealth, Teva, Giuliani, Dr Falk Pharma, Sanofi he has received financial support for research from Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer. Cauli, Alberto: No conflict of interest Onali, Sara: Consultant/lecture fees to: Abbvie, Alfasigma, MSD, Takeda, J & J, Galapagos, Pfizer, Eli Lilly
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piras et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: