Findings show headache predicts meningitis in symptomatic individuals with cryptococcal antigenemia, suggesting improved diagnostic strategies.
Background People with HIV-associated cryptococcal antigenemia are at high risk for meningitis and death. In resource-limited settings, lumbar puncture to evaluate for meningitis is infrequently performed in asymptomatic individuals; therefore, symptomatic individuals are prioritized. We evaluated the predictive value of meningeal symptoms for cryptococcal meningitis in people with cryptococcal antigenemia. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis from three randomized clinical trials conducted in Uganda between 2017 and 2024. We included adults with meningeal symptoms who had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing performed. Logistic regressions and classification trees were used to determine the associations between meningeal symptoms and meningitis. Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and misclassification rate were used to evaluate model performance. Results Among 344 participants, median CrAg titer was 1:1280 (IQR 1:100,1:2560). Overall, 285 (83%) presented with headache and 205 (60%) participants had meningitis. Presence of headache was associated with meningitis (adjusted odds ratio 11.7, 95% CI 5.23–28.50). The AUROC of headache alone to predict meningitis was 0.65 (95%CI 0.61–0.69), with 95% sensitivity and 35% specificity. The AUROC improved to 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.90) when stiff neck, photophobia, confusion, sex, and CrAg titer ≥1:160 were added to the logistic regression model. In the final classification tree, headache combined with CrAg titer ≥1:160 demonstrated the highest probability (79%) of meningitis. Conclusions Headache and high CrAg titer is the most reliable predictor for meningitis. In the absence of plasma CrAg titration, symptoms of headache, stiff neck, photophobia, and confusion predict meningitis for individuals with cryptococcal antigenemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Najjuka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: