Research explores how Pepys's diary and mortality records shaped public health awareness and policies.
In the mid-1660s, London was impacted by the plague, and the period saw important changes in the government's responsibilities around issues of public health. This research studies the Bills of Mortality, the accounting for death and the use of these accounts, as reported in Samuel Pepys's journal 1 or diary, to explore how these public accounts informed individuals, increased debate, awareness, policies and regulations around health. The research uses a microhistory, narrative approach to study the diarist's use of the Bills and life during the plague year. The contribution of this research is in the use of this detailed diary to explore the accounting of death and illness in the time of the plague, giving insight into policy around public health and the restriction of public rights to protect the public. The research also explores how individuals use these accounts to determine their actions, investigating how non-conventional forms of accounting can drive judgments and decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karen McBride (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: