Mature defense mechanisms support patients’ engagement in psychotherapy. The Overall Defensive Functioning (ODF) scale of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Defensive Functioning Scale (DFS) is a measure of the maturity of patients’ defenses. Immature defenses (e.g., splitting) and poor emotion regulation are hallmarks of borderline personality organization, and both can interfere with positive treatment engagement. We predicted that ODF would significantly and negatively correlate with the Personality Assessment Inventory Borderline (PAI-BOR) scales, PAI Treatment Rejection (PAI-RXR) scale, and the PAI Treatment Process Index (PAI-TPI). To our knowledge, no studies have examined the relationship between ODF scores, as measured by the DFS rating of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives, and defense levels, PAI-BOR Full Scale (PAI-BOR-FS), PAI-RXR, and PAI-TPI scales. The sample included 73 outpatients from an academic hospital. Patients were administered the PAI and a TAT protocol. Two psychologists independently rated 40 TAT protocols with the observer-rated DFS for reliability. Healthy defenses showed significant negative correlations with PAI-BOR-FS (r=−.27), PAI-BOR Negative Relationships (PAI-BOR-N) (r=−.38), and PAI-RXR (r=.30). The pathological defenses had positive correlations with four of the five PAI-BOR scales and the PAI-TPI. There were significant correlations between ODF and the treatment related scales, PAIRXR (r=.37, p<.01) and PAI-TPI (r=−.32, p<.01). ODF significantly and negatively correlated with the PAI BOR-FS (r=−.36, p<.01) and its subscales, Affective Instability (r=−.35, p<.01) and Negative Relationships (r=−.39, p<.01). High and low ODF groups had significant and meaningful differences on all seven PAI scales. Overall, these findings provide support for the construct validity and clinical utility of the DFS defense levels (healthy, neurotic, and pathological) and the global ODF.
Richardson et al. (2025) studied this question.