Simulation study demonstrates improved sensor efficiency in sound field reconstruction in dynamic environments, suggesting greater effectiveness than traditional methods.
Sound field reconstruction estimates a continuous acoustic field from limited measurements. Yet, sensor placement is often handled by non-adaptive methods (prior designs) that suit spatially stationary fields but can be inefficient for nonstationary sound fields. Within a Bayesian/Gaussian process framework, we first analyze standard non-adaptive criteria (entropy, mutual information, Bayesian Cramér–Rao bound, and transductive experimental design), clarifying equivalences and their geometric consequences—most notably farthest-point tendencies that yield space-filling coverage. Motivated by these insights, we propose an adaptive sampling (AS) strategy that selects sensors sequentially, where leave-one-out cross-validation targets high-error regions (exploitation), whereas a wavelength-based spacing rule (minimum λ/4) maintains global coverage (exploration) and prevents clustering. In simulations, AS matches space-filling designs on stationary fields and substantially improves efficiency on nonstationary fields; for the same normalized mean square error, AS uses about half as many sensors, in terms of the median, as non-adaptive methods. These results indicate that AS can substantially improve the efficiency of sensor placement in practical, sequential measurement workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: