Investigates cadmium stress effects on physiological responses in non-heading Chinese cabbage, indicating insights for phytoremediation.
Cadmium (Cd) pollution is a global environmental issue that severely impacts crop growth and food safety. This study systematically investigates the accumulation characteristics and physiological responses of different varieties of non-heading Chinese cabbage under Cd stress. A Cd stress experiment was conducted using 79 non-heading Chinese cabbage varieties under nutrient film technique (NFT) cultivation, leading to the identification of 11 high-Cd accumulation varieties, 32 medium-Cd accumulation varieties, and 36 low-Cd accumulation varieties. The results showed that all varieties primarily accumulated Cd in the roots, with weak translocation of Cd to the aerial parts. To thoroughly analyze the physiological mechanisms of Cd accumulation, two extreme phenotypes, low accumulation (GX-61) and high accumulation (GX-05), were selected for subsequent comprehensive analysis. The low-accumulation variety (GX-61) exhibited higher sensitivity to Cd stress, with significant inhibition of leaf area, canopy area, and photosynthesis. In contrast, the high-accumulation variety (GX-05) maintained a more stable physiological state by enhancing photoprotective capacity and activating peroxidase (POD) to compensate for the functional loss of catalase (CAT). Cd stress inhibition of photosynthesis was initially limited by stomatal factors, later transitioning to non-stomatal limitations, and low concentrations of Cd induced a protective response that slightly promoted plant growth. This study, through high temporal resolution analysis at key growth stages, reveals the differential responses in growth, photosynthesis, and physiological metabolism between low- and high-Cd-accumulating non-heading Chinese cabbages, providing a theoretical basis for the selection of efficient phytoremediation materials and the safe production of non-heading Chinese cabbage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: