Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study examines combination therapy outcomes in favorable-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma, suggesting clinical heterogeneity.
Background/Objectives: For patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and VEGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first-line therapies. However, the clinical benefit of these regimens in patients with favorable IMDC risk remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients with favorable-risk metastatic RCC treated with first-line systemic therapy at the Samsung Medical Center between 2019 and 2023. Treatment regimens included TKI monotherapy (n = 110) or ICI–TKI combinations (n = 37). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: At a median follow-up of 46.3 months, the overall median PFS was 20.1 months (95% CI, 14.5–25.7). Median PFS was 26.2 months with ICI–TKI combinations versus 17.0 months with TKI monotherapy (HR 1.32; 95% CI, 0.82–2.12; p = 0.25). In multivariate analysis, TKI monotherapy (HR 14.01; p = 0.002) and liver metastasis (HR 9.17; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of shorter PFS. ORR was significantly higher with combination therapy (68% vs. 46%; p = 0.01). Median OS was not reached in either group, with 3-year OS rates of 89% and 84%, respectively. Conclusions: The findings suggest that even within the favorable-risk population, clinical heterogeneity influences treatment outcomes, emphasizing the need for individualized therapy selection and refined prognostic models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: