Key result
School-based BP screening programs exhibit substantial variability, with only ~18% adhering to recommended diagnostic processes.
Why the study?
School-based programs represent a potential avenue for population-wide paediatric BP screening, but literature reporting these programs required systematic scoping regarding measurement protocols, diagnostic process coverage, and implementation considerations.
Systematic Review
There is substantial variability in school-based BP screening protocols, highlighting the need for a pragmatic, standardized protocol that balances feasibility with diagnostic accuracy.
Substantial variability in school BP screening undermines reliability; leaves open the need for standardized, feasible protocols.
School-based programs represent a potential avenue for conducting population-wide paediatric blood pressure (BP) screening. The aim of this review was to systematically scope peer-reviewed literature reporting school-based BP screening, with respect to measurement protocols, diagnostic process coverage, and implementation considerations. Only peer-reviewed articles in English across PubMed, OVID Medline and OVID Embase were included. Two authors independently screened the article titles and abstracts prior to undertaking a full-text review. All disagreements were resolved through discussion and agreement. From each study, four categories of information were extracted: general information, BP measurement methodology, diagnostic process coverage, and implementation strategies. Each article was then assigned to one of three categories regarding the stated or implied study objectives: general school-based research incorporating BP measurement, hypertension prevalence studies, or hypertension screening studies. Of the 112 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, only 17 were categorised as hypertension screening studies. Within these, there was substantial variability in BP measurement techniques and adherence to the diagnostic process recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Additionally, there was minimal reporting on implementation strategies. A pragmatic, standardised protocol for school-based BP screening is needed that includes recommended measurement methods, considers the trade-offs (in terms of feasibility and economics) of covering more or less of the diagnostic process in schools vs health care settings, and covers approaches to optimise implementability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glenning et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in High blood pressure. School-based blood pressure screening was evaluated on Blood pressure measurement methodologies, diagnostic process coverage, and implementation strategies. School-based blood pressure screening programs exhibited substantial variability in measurement techniques, with only 3 of 17 studies adhering to the recommended diagnostic process.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: