Theoretical framework explores civilizational stability through interactions of production, extraction, and legitimacy, implying broader implications for historical analysis.
This paper presents a unified theoretical framework for understanding civilizational stability and collapse based on the interaction between production, extraction, existential meaning, and legitimacy. Drawing on economic payoff models, feedback dynamics, Beckerian hero-system theory, and historical isomorphisms ranging from the Late Bronze Age collapse to modern cybersecurity, it demonstrates that instability begins when extraction becomes both materially profitable and existentially meaningful, while maintenance loses narrative legitimacy. The model formalizes legitimacy inertia, meaning-augmented utility, and positive feedback loops that generate tipping points prior to material deprivation. Rather than offering empirical prediction, the paper provides a reusable structural framework, diagnostic indicators, and control inequalities intended for critique, extension, and application across historical and modern contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Dominik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: