Narrative synthesis explores osteopontin's role in obesity, heart disease, and implications for risk in cardiometabolic conditions.
Background Residual cardiovascular (CV) risk persists despite therapeutic advances. Obesity is heterogeneous, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) dysfunction (‘adiposopathy’) complicates risk stratification. Osteopontin (OPN) is a pleiotropic mediator implicated in VAT inflammation, senescence‐associated pathways, atherosclerosis and myocardial remodelling. Methods We performed a narrative synthesis of preclinical and clinical evidence on OPN across three domains: (i) VAT biology and senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP); (ii) atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability; and (iii) myocardial fibrosis/remodelling and cardiometabolic heart failure. We also summarize biomarker and therapeutic implications. Results OPN is increased in obesity, particularly within VAT, where it contributes to SASP‐related signalling, macrophage dysfunction, low‐grade systemic inflammation, insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk. Clinical and translational studies link circulating and tissue OPN levels to vascular inflammation, plaque vulnerability and adverse CV events. In the myocardium, OPN appears to act as a remodelling‐specific mediator connecting extracardiac adiposity‐related signals to interstitial fibrosis, with the strongest evidence in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Across settings, OPN shows promise as an early biomarker for detection and risk stratification. Experimental modulation of OPN attenuates fibrosis and improves cardiac function in multiple models, supporting its candidacy as a mechanistic therapeutic target. Conclusions OPN likely bridges the fat–heart axis through senescence‐related pathways and may help explain residual CV risk in obesity‐related cardiometabolic disease. Standardized assays, prospective validation and interventional studies are required to establish clinical utility for OPN as a biomarker and therapeutic target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelauz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: