Geophysical assessments identify archaeological features in Area 340, highlighting mitigation strategies for dredging impacts.
Geophysical and hydrographic survey data were collected during 2022 as part of the regional monitoring surveys for several marine aggregate extraction areas on behalf of the South Coast Dredging Association (SCDA). Data were collected within pre-defined boundaries covering a minimum of the dredging footprint and a pre-approved buffer. The data were assessed by a qualified and experienced maritime archaeologist to identify any features of potential archaeological significance and undertake a comparison with previously identified features, including within the archaeological baseline assessment undertaken prior to the commencement of dredging. The archaeological assessment of the data from Area 340 is being undertaken to fulfil marine licence monitoring conditions. Conclusions Exclusion zones Following the review of the 2022 dataset, four exclusion zones has been recommended for retention within the extents of the licence area for Area 340. Impacts from dredging activities Contacts of high potential re-identified during the period of dredging activity suggest minimal impact to known archaeological sites within Area 340. No additional sites of high or medium potential have been identified in the geophysical and hydrographic data that may have been exposed as a result of dredging operations, suggesting the potential impact of dredging to the historic environment within Area 340 is minimal. The review of the 2022 datasets and previous archaeological reports established that the recommended exclusion zones are proportional and of a size suitable to mitigate impacts to the historic environment within Area 340.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mateusz Polakowski (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: