Narrative review reveals species shift and rising antifungal resistance in candidemia across diverse populations, indicating urgent public health needs.
Introduction: Candidemia has emerged as a major cause of bloodstream infections in Indian hospitals, contributing substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Over the past two decades, a distinct epidemiological transition from Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida (NAC) species has been observed, accompanied by rising antifungal resistance and the emergence of Candida Auris as a multidrug-resistant pathogen. Objective: To synthesize evidence from Indian studies on the epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical outcomes of candidemia across adult, pediatric, and neonatal populations. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Ended, and Google Scholar for English-language publications from 2000–2024. Studies describing laboratory-confirmed candidemia in India were included and analyzed for regional trends, resistance profiles, and patient outcomes. Results: Across more than three decades of surveillance, C. tropicalis and C. parasitosis have replaced C. albicans as predominant isolates, particularly in intensive-care, oncology, and neonatal settings. Fluconazole resistance among NAC species is increasing, while C. auris demonstrates multidrug resistance and frequent ICU-associated outbreaks. Reported mortality rates range from 30 to 60 percent, highest in neonates and immunocompromised patients. Delayed diagnosis, empirical azole use, and limited antifungal stewardship amplify disease burden. Conclusion: Candidemia in India represents an evolving public-health challenge driven by NAC predominance and escalating antifungal resistance. Strengthening mycology laboratories, incorporating species-level identification, and integrating fungal surveillance into national AMR programs are imperative for early detection, rational therapy, and improved patient survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheerin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: