Key result
Biventricular pacing improves outcomes and LVEF in HF, especially with LBBB and QRS ≥150ms.
Why the study?
Does cardiac physiologic pacing improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, LVEF ≤50%, and high pacing burden or wide QRS?
Does cardiac physiologic pacing improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, LVEF ≤50%, and high pacing burden or wide QRS?
Cardiac physiologic pacing, traditionally via biventricular pacing and increasingly via conduction system pacing, provides significant clinical and echocardiographic benefits in patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF.
Reinforces guideline-directed biventricular pacing in symptomatic heart failure with wide Q.
Cardiac physiologic pacing, also known as cardiac resynchronization therapy, is indicated in patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% or less, and either a high (or anticipated high) ventricular pacing burden or a wide QRS complex. Traditionally, physiologic pacing has been achieved with biventricular pacing with a right ventricular lead and a coronary sinus branch lead. Randomized trials involving more than 10,000 patients with heart failure have shown clinical, exercise, and quality-of-life benefits associated with biventricular pacing, as well as improved LVEF and reduced mitral regurgitation and ventricular volumes. These benefits are greatest in patients with left bundle-branch block and a QRS duration of 150 msec or longer. Recent studies support targeting the His bundle or left bundle branch as an alternative cardiac physiologic pacing strategy. Ongoing randomized trials are expected to more clearly define the comparative efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing as compared with biventricular pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chelu et al. (2026) studied this question. Biventricular pacing improves clinical outcomes and left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients, particularly those with left bundle-branch block and a QRS duration ≥150 msec.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: