Optimally engineered CAR-T cells exhibit superior antitumor effects in solid tumors compared to TCR-T cells, suggesting effective treatment strategies.
Tumor-specific HLA/peptides (pHLA) represent attractive therapeutic targets for cancer. Two cell-based modalities can target pHLA-expressing tumors: T cell receptors (TCRs) or TCR-mimetic (TCRm) antibodies reformatted as chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Using HLA-A2/MAGEA4₂₃₀₋₂₃₉ as a model pHLA, we discerned the relative potency of TCR-T and CAR-T cells, informing how to best deploy these for clinical benefit. Although TCR-T cells were more sensitive at detecting low-density pHLA, TCR-T cells exerted only transient in vivo antitumor efficacy followed by tumor relapse due to deficient TCR-T cell proliferation and persistence that was associated with a more differentiated and dysfunctional phenotype. By contrast, CAR-T cells with encoded costimulatory signaling fully regressed tumors. Insufficient TCR-T cell durability was overcome by coengaging 41BB or IL-2 signaling pathways, thereby enhancing tumor control in vivo. These data establish differential activities of human TCR-T and CAR-T cells targeting the same pHLA and inform the development of optimal targeting strategies to induce durable clinical responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Decker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: