This review examines low microsatellite instability's clinical features in colorectal and gastric cancers, suggesting its significance in therapy outcomes.
Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by impaired mismatch repair (MMR), has gained prominence as a biomarker predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancers. MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours exhibit widespread instability across multiple microsatellite loci and are well-characterized. In contrast, low-level microsatellite instability (MSI-L)—marked by instability at a low number of loci—is poorly understood and its biological relevance remains controversial. MSI-L has often been grouped together with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours, given the lack of consistent molecular distinctions. However, some studies, particularly in colorectal and gastric cancers, have reported that MSI-L correlates with distinct clinical and molecular features, including poorer prognosis, increased tumour mutational burden (TMB) following chemotherapy, and better response to platinum/5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Notably, these associations frequently involve instability at dinucleotide repeat markers, hinting at a specific subset of MSI-L. Moreover, recent data provide initial evidence that MSI-L may be associated with subtle alterations of genes involved in DNA damage tolerance pathways. This review aims to clarify the current understanding of MSI-L by (a) comparing diagnostic methods and their influence on MSI-L classification, (b) summarizing clinical and molecular associations of MSI-L specifically in gastric and colorectal cancer, (c) highlighting new aspects regarding potential mechanisms underlying MSI-L, focusing on the particular unstable marker and a possible role of the DNA damage tolerance pathways, and (d) discussing whether MSI-L, particularly defined by dinucleotide repeat instability, may serve as a marker for therapeutic vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: