PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026The Urban Review0 citationsOpen Access

Historicizing Disadvantage: What Does “Controlling for Poverty” Really Mean?

View Full Paper
AWAshley L. WhiteRSRuss SkibaPMPhelton C. Moss

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine how controlling for poverty in educational studies oversimplifies the impact of systemic racism and historical disadvantages.
  • Critiques the concept of "controlling for poverty" in existing educational research.
  • Analyzes the interplay between economic disadvantages and systemic racism.
  • Reviews historical context related to racial oppression and its impact on education.
  • Demonstrates that controlling for poverty undermines the effects of systemic racism.
  • Indicates that true disparities in education are tied to historical inequities, not just current economic status.
  • Suggests re-evaluating how poverty is utilized as a measure in educational studies.

Abstract

Abstract In this manuscript and in commemoration of the 1975 Children’s Defense Fund Report, we critique the use of “controlling for poverty” on racial disparities in school discipline in educational research, contending that this method problematically minimizes the role of systemic racism and historical inequities. To ground this argument, we utilize the backdrop of the economic disadvantages deeply intertwined with race due to centuries of racial oppression. To provide a more accurate and nuanced understanding of educational inequities, we advocate for re-evaluating poverty as a proxy for historical racism through including both current systemic factors and historical racism in analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b4cahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-025-00780-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper