Pilot study demonstrates improved motor function and brain activation in children with cerebral palsy following gait training, suggesting potential neuroplastic benefits.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of a two-week robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) program on walking performance and brain activation in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP).DesignSingle-group, pre-post pilot study.MethodsEight children with CP were enrolled; six completed the protocol and provided usable gait and functional MRI (fMRI) data. Participants received 10 RAGT sessions over two weeks. Walking performance (6-min walk test [6MWT], 10-meter walk test [10MWT], GAITRite gait speed and cadence) was assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one-month follow-up. Pre- and post-intervention fMRI during a lower-limb motor task quantified activated voxels in motor and cerebellar regions.Results6MWT distance, 10MWT speed, and GAITRite gait speed and cadence improved significantly (all p ≤ 0.009) at post-intervention and follow-up versus baseline. In children with isolated subcortical lesions (n = 4), activated voxels during the lower-limb task increased in the lesioned motor cortex (from 363 to 1,075; p = 0.02), with similar increases in ipsilesional cerebellar hemispheres (p = 0.02), whereas no significant changes were seen in children with additional hydrocephalus (n = 2). Change in cadence correlated positively with change in lesioned motor cortex activation (Spearman's ρ = 0.83, p = 0.03).ConclusionsIn this small cohort, a two-week RAGT program was associated with short-term improvements in walking performance and increased fMRI activation in motor-related regions, particularly in children with subcortical lesions. These preliminary, lesion-type-specific findings suggest neuroplastic responses to RAGT that warrant confirmation in larger controlled studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Picelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: