Comparative evaluation measures accuracy of peri-implant defects in a dental context, indicating potential for reliable tools.
CBCT showed the highest agreement with direct measurements, followed by US, while IOS exhibited greater variability. Defect type and measurement modality were the primary determinants of accuracy. These findings indicate that CBCT and US can be considered reliable tools for assessing peri-implant bone defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tayman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: