Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 2025Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyOpen Access

Comparative evaluation of ultrasonography with cone-beam computed tomography for peri-implant bone loss analysis – A cadaveric goat mandible study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TMThamil Selvan MuthurajRJRenganath Murugan JeyasreeGRGokulvathi Rajkumar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis shows ultrasonography and direct measurement effectively assess peri-implant bone loss in goats, suggesting potential advancements in diagnostic tools.

Key Points

  • Ultrasonography is more effective than cone-beam computed tomography for identifying peri-implant bone defects.
  • Mean height measurement of defects with ultrasonography was 6.05 mm, comparable to direct measurement.
  • Evaluation included endosseous implants in cadaveric goat mandibles, highlighting the approach's practical application.
  • These findings suggest ultrasonography could be a reliable tool for routine implant follow-ups in clinical settings.

Cite This Study

Muthuraj et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4ec6ad7bf08b1ead8086https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_83_24
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of ultrasonography in assessing peri‐implant osseous defects: An in vitro study2026
  2. 2Sonography in the diagnosis of peri‐implant bone defects: An in vitro study on native human mandibles2024
  3. 3Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Technical Implant Errors: A Pilot Study in Sheep Model2024
  4. 4Comparative Analysis of Examination Methods for Periapical Lesion Diagnostics: Assessing Cone-Beam Computer Tomography, Ultrasound, and Periapical Radiography2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Agreement Between Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Bone Sounding, Pulse–Echo Ultrasound, and Caliper Measurements for Gingival Thickness Assessment: A Method-Comparison Study2026