PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 20261 citations

Interactive effects of irrigation and nitrogen management on greenhouse gas emissions and resource efficiency in alfalfa production

View Full Paper
TQTianyi QuJLJiabei LiXSXiaodan Song

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how different combinations of irrigation and nitrogen affect greenhouse gas emissions and productivity in alfalfa.
  • Conducted a field experiment in an arid region of Northwest China.
  • Applied twelve irrigation-nitrogen treatment combinations to alfalfa plants.
  • Measured N2O, CO2, and CH4 fluxes, global warming potential, and resource-use efficiencies.
  • Soil conditions influenced N2O emissions, peaking after irrigation or fertilization.
  • Excessive nitrogen and water inputs raised GHG emissions and reduced resource productivity.
  • A balanced irrigation-nitrogen regime significantly lowered N2O emissions by up to 93% and GWP by 24.1%.

Abstract

IntroductionMitigating agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining forage productivity is a key challenge under global carbon-neutrality goals. To evaluate the environmental and agronomic trade-offs of irrigation and nitrogen management, a field experiment was conducted in an arid region of Northwest China.MethodsTwelve irrigation-nitrogen treatment combinations were applied to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to quantify N2O, CO2, and CH4 fluxes, global warming potential (GWP), and resource-use efficiencies.ResultsResults showed that soil water-filled pore space and available nitrogen strongly regulated N2O, emissions, with peaks occurring within one week after irrigation or fertilization. Excessive water and nitrogen inputs significantly increased GHG emissions and reduced irrigation water productivity (IWP) and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN).Discussion and ConclusionConversely, the high-water, moderate-nitrogen regime (300 mm irrigation + 120 kg N ha-1) achieved a balanced outcome—sustaining high yield while reducing cumulative N2O emissions by 29.5-93%, total GWP (LCA-based) by 24.1%, and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) by 29.0% relative to conventional high-input management (W2N3). These preliminary findings suggest a water-nitrogen synergy zone that improves yield-GHG trade-offs, though multi-year validation is required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1a9feba4585c2d6d2c2https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1740107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper