CONTEXT Sustainable intensification of rice systems is hindered by the trade-off where organic inputs enhance fertility but stimulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to: (1) globally synthesize how irrigation modulates carbon-driven GHG trade-offs, and (2) evaluate management strategies that decouple agronomic returns from climate penalties. METHODS We combined a targeted meta-analysis of 39 field studies with a three-year factorial field experiment. We evaluated field-scale climate, production, water-use, soil‑carbon, and economic outcomes. Net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB) accounted for grain income, agronomic costs, and the monetized net GHG balance, including seasonal methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions expressed as CO 2 equivalents and the estimated soil organic carbon (SOC)-change term. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity in irrigation-mediated CH 4 responses to organic amendments, with no consistent attenuation under water-saving irrigation (WSI). In the field experiment, relative to the corresponding flood irrigation (FI) treatments, controlled irrigation (CI) reduced seasonal CH 4 emissions by 34–55% and net GHG emissions by 23–49%, but increased N 2 O emissions. Furthermore, while all organic amendments enhanced SOC, yield, and NEEB, their climate impacts diverged. Straw incorporation amplified CH 4 emissions, whereas manure substitution reduced N 2 O emissions compared with synthetic fertilization. Among the treatments evaluated, CI-Manure showed the most consistent balance by maintaining relatively high yield and economic return while reducing NGHGE and irrigation input relative to FI-Fert. SIGNIFICANCE These findings identify conditions under which coordinated irrigation and amendment management may improve field-scale climate and production outcomes in irrigated rice systems with reliable water control and locally available organic resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: