A population-based study characterized uropathogens and their effects on clinical outcomes in acute pyelonephritis, indicating evolving microbiological trends.
Purpose The microbial aetiologies of acute pyelonephritis (APN) may change over time. We aimed to describe long-term trends in microbiological diagnostics and pathogen distribution in patients with hospital-diagnosed APN, and to characterise clinical outcomes by pathogens. Methods We conducted a population-based, serial cross-sectional and cohort study of patients with hospital-diagnosed APN in North Denmark across three periods covering 2000-2018. National health registries were linked with microbiological data to describe temporal trends in microbiological diagnostics and pathogen distribution, and to provide a descriptive comparison of median length of stay (LOS) with interquartile range (IQR) and 30-day cumulative mortality with 95% confidence interval (CI) between Escherichia coli and non- E. coli APN. Results We identified 5338 APN episodes among 4773 patients. The proportion with urine culture increased from 75.1% in 2000-2006 to 92.9% in 2013-2018, with a concomitant increase in the proportion with a positive urine culture from 44.4% to 56.7%. The median LOS declined by 2 days across calendar periods. E. coli remained the predominant pathogen with a prevalence in the range 77.3%-81.9%. Non- E. coli APN was more common in male, older, and comorbid patients, and was characterised by longer LOS (median 5 days [IQR: 3-8] vs. 4 days [IQR: 2-6]) and higher 30-day mortality (3.7% [95% CI 2.3%-5.2%] vs. 1.0% [95% CI 0.6%-1.5%]) compared with E. coli . Conclusion Microbiological testing increased during the study period, and the pathogen distribution remained largely stable with E. coli as the predominant uropathogen. Non- E. coli infections were associated with slightly less favourable short-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svingel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: