Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparison of nucleated cell counts in effusions demonstrates accuracy for identifying FIP in cats, suggesting reliable analysis methods.
The ratio of the nucleated cell counts (ΔTNC) provided by the Sysmex XT-2000iV DIFF and BASO channels has been proven to be useful in differentiating effusions in cats; in particular, a ΔTNC > 2.5 was found to have high accuracy for effusive FIP. The objective of this study was to compare the ΔTNC obtained with the Sysmex XT-2000iV and Sysmex XN-1000V on different types of effusions. Fresh effusions from cats were evaluated with both analyzers. WBC-BASO, WBC-DIFF, and ΔTNC-XT from the Sysmex XT-2000iV and TNC-WNR, TNC-WDF, and ΔTNC-XN from the Sysmex XN-1000V were recorded and compared. Forty-five feline effusions were collected. The results were not significantly different for all parameters evaluated. The Passing and Bablok regression analysis for ΔTNC-XT and ΔTNC-XN revealed a slope of 1.612 (95% CI 1.030 to 2.316) and an intercept of −0.744 (95% CI −1.591 to −0.120); the Bland–Altman difference plot showed a positive bias of 4.382 (p = 0.02). Despite the finding of a positive proportional and constant bias between ΔTNC-XT and ΔTNC-XN, evident especially at high ΔTNC values, samples were classified accordingly between the two analyzers when ΔTNC-XT cut-offs were used, allowing the same accuracy for the identification of suspected and compatible FIP samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: