Key result
Rural adults in Puducherry show a ~47% prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
Cross-Sectional (n=150)
No
A high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (47.3%) was found among rural adults in Puducherry, India, driven by high rates of physical inactivity, family history, and hypertension.
A BSTRACT Background: In India, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an emerging burden that is increasing in accord with the rural areas due to the changing lifestyles and inaccessible health centers. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus among rural adults in Puducherry. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out on 150 adults visiting the outpatients of a government hospital in Puducherry. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering socio-demographics, risk factors, diabetes symptoms, and self-reported diagnosis. Random blood glucose testing was performed for undiagnosed participants reporting symptoms. Frequencies and percentages were used for descriptive analysis. Results: The overall prevalence of T2DM was 47.3%, with 38.7% previously diagnosed and 8.7% newly identified through symptom screening and blood glucose testing. Major risk factors included physical inactivity (56%), family history of diabetes (51.3%), obesity (20.7%), hypertension (40.7%), tobacco use (28%), and inadequate sleep (38%). Psychosocial stress and unhealthy dietary patterns were also common. Conclusion: This study shows that it is essential to implement community-based screening, organized lifestyle interventions, and risk-factor education program to reduce the prevalence of diabetes in rural communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saktisvary et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=150). Rural lifestyle and sociodemographic risk factors was evaluated on Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among rural adults in Puducherry was 47.3%, with physical inactivity (56%) and family history (51.3%) as major risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: