Uncovers strategies to enhance peace negotiations in Sudan by separating military and political discussions, suggesting better international engagement.
This paper highlights how various political and military groups in Sudan have spoiled efforts to achieve peace during the ongoing conflict in Sudan, pointing at the failures of the international community’s approach for peace talks. To mitigate these spoiling behaviors, the paper suggests a two-track approach that keeps military talks separate from political discussions. This strategy aims to encourage more effective international engagement in the process and decrease the influence of spoiling in order to create a more positive environment for peace talks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudan Democracy Action Project (SDA) (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: