Finds decreased working memory and increased cognitive effort in female endurance athletes post-marathon, suggesting energy availability affects cognition.
Purpose: We tested the hypothesis that marathon racing reduces working memory performance and increases frontal theta activity in trained female endurance athletes. We further examined whether changes in cognitive performance or brain activity were associated with either acute and/or chronic risk of low energy availability. Methods: Sixteen female Tier 2 runners (42 ± 9 y; VO 2 max 45.6 ± 6 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) underwent VO 2 max testing and the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) 7-14 days prior to a Marathon. Participants completed 1-back (low load) and 3-back (high load) working memory tasks during electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, performed before and immediately after the race (<10 mins). Accuracy and reaction time measured cognitive performance, and frontal theta power measured cognitive effort. Results: Sixteen runners completed the marathon in 4:16 ± 37 min (70 ± 6% VO 2 max), with a mean carbohydrate intake of 28 ± 14 g/hr. Six athletes exceeded the LEAF-Q threshold (>=8) and eight reported menstrual dysfunction. Post-race, 3-back accuracy declined (−18.8%, p =.003) while reaction time shortened for both task versions (5.3–6.6%, p =.002). Frontal theta increased post-race (1-back: +26.8%; 3-back: +29.6%, p <.001). Regression models showed 3-back accuracy changes were predicted by LEAF-Q score (β = 0.494, p =.016). In contrast, theta increases were predicted by a combination of lower carbohydrate intake (β = −0.025, p =.005), longer race time (β = 0.008, p =.005), and higher LEAF-Q score (β = 0.121, p <.001). Conclusions: Working memory performance is reduced and cognitive effort is increased after marathon racing in trained female athletes. These effects are linked to both acute and chronic risk of low energy availability, emphasizing the need for individualized fueling strategies to preserve cognitive performance during endurance events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boere et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: